| Catalog Number |
8065750469 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Obstruction of Flow (2423); Improper Flow or Infusion (2954)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Eye Burn (2523)
|
| Date of Event |
05/05/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A healthcare professional reported that during surgery, the ophthalmic handpiece became occluded and had poor irrigation, and the patient experienced a corneal burn and underwent corneal suture and also received corticoids as a local treatment.The current patient condition was resolved.This complaint is pertaining the second of three reports received from the initial reporter.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).H.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected information provided in d.1 additional information was provided in sections d.9, h.3 h.6 and h.11.The product under investigation is not a serviceable device.Therefore, a service record review was not performed.However, a handpiece (hp) was returned for testing on this investigation.A non-conformance-based review of the serial number was performed and did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.A manufacturing device history record (dhr) review was performed prior to product release to ensure that the product was manufactured in compliance with the device master record.Based on the assessment, the product met release criteria.A review for complaints reported against this serial number was performed.No similar complaints were reported for the product serial under investigation with the same event code.The hp was received for testing on this investigation.A visual assessment of the returned sample revealed no obvious non-conformity.The handpiece was connected to a calibrated resistance breakout box, where the resistance and dissipation were found to be within specification.A flow rate test was performed on the irrigation and aspiration lines of the handpiece which found the handpiece to meet specifications.The handpiece was connected to dynamic tuning fixture (dtf) for stroke length testing on the longitudinal and torsional movements which found the handpiece to not meet specifications.The root cause of the reported ¿poor irrigation and occlusion¿ was found to meet specifications.Manufacturer will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).H.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|