|
The device was not returned for analysis.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot specific issue.Based on the information received, the investigation determined that the reported material separation and foreign body in patient resulting in unexpected medical intervention appears to be related to operational context.In this case, it is possible that the reported material separation and foreign body in patient resulting in unexpected medical intervention is due to patient disease state and/or use techniques employed; however, since the device was not returned this could not be confirmed.Also, it is unknown if the physician spun too close to the spring tip.Based on the results of the complaint investigation, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|