| Model Number |
VICMO 13.2 (- 14.50) |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Iritis (1940); Uveitis (2122); Blurred Vision (2137)
|
| Date of Event |
06/26/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6 - type of investigation: 4110 - lens work order search: no similar complaint type events reported for units within the same lot.H11: manufacture narrative: secondary surgical intervention to remove/replace/reposition the lens is identified in the labeling as a known potential adverse event following icl implantation.H11: manufacture narrative: uveitis/iritis, iritis is an inflammatory condition which is common after intra-ocular surgery, however this is usually mild and does not require any additional interventions beyond the standard post-op regimen.In some cases, the degree of inflammation may be more severe and require extended steroid treatment.Procedural factors including excessive surgical manipulation and the use of pro-inflammatory substances in the eye may have contributed to the event.Mechanical insult to the iris can result in a prolonged or stronger inflammatory response.An exact cause could not be determined as the event could be multifactorial in nature including patient and/or procedure related factors.Claim #: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A facility representative reported that following an implantable collamer lens (icl) implantation procedure the patient experienced excessive vault, significant reduction of irido-corneal angles, significant shallowing of the ac, blurred vision, uveitis/iritis.Treatment performed.Ac inflammation.Medication administered.Iris atrophy and the lens was exchanged for a shorter length lens and problem resolved.The cause of event was reported as other, "wrong size lens calculation.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6- method code 3331: device history record (dhr) review: based on the results of the investigation, all released devices from the associated work orders(s), including the suspected device, have been manufactured within established parameters; and there is no indication that the manufacturing and processing of the device contributed to the complaint issue.Claim # (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|