• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US SIGMA STAB GVF INS 2 8MM; SIGMA KNEE PRIMARY : KNEE TIBIAL INSERT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US SIGMA STAB GVF INS 2 8MM; SIGMA KNEE PRIMARY : KNEE TIBIAL INSERT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 158121008
Medical Device Problem Code No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Unspecified Musculoskeletal problem (4535)
Date of Event 06/18/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Additional narrative: if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that voluntary report was received (b)(4).Original surgery date for right total knee arthroplasty (b)(6) 2021.Patient required a knee replacement 6/18/2025.When the old knee replacement was removed, there was significant damage to the joint which was not expected and seemed to be a manufacturing defect.Doi: (b)(6) 2021.Dor: (b)(6) 2025.Affected side: right knee.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint #(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees hat the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H11 additional narrative: added: d10.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint #(b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.The product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A records evaluation (mre) was not perform.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of the post-market surveillance.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information provided: "it was reported that voluntary report received (b)(4) patient required a knee replacement [date redacted].When the old knee replacement (initially placed [date redacted] --approximately 3.5 years ago) was removed, there was significant damage to the joint which was not expected and seemed to be a manufacturing defect".The product was not returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics; however, photos were provided for review.See attachment ((b)(4) device photo ad (b)(6) 2025 and (b)(4) device photo ad (b)(6) 2025 (2)).The photo investigation revealed the insert with signs of being implanted for a period of time and what appears to be pitting patterns on the device condyles.Furthermore, on the device base surface, one of the locking tabs was found deformed/towards one side.Pitting condition suggests that debris was making contact/friction between the insert and the femoral component in an off-axis position.However, consideration must be given to all other potential influences such as surgical process, patient variables (e.G.Activity level and use), anatomical considerations and patient changes over time.Any conclusions from the investigational input provided have to be placed into context with all other relevant factors.As for the deformation observed, potential cause can be traced to the extraction process.However, without concrete evidence or further information, it is not possible to determine a root cause.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the sigma stab gvf ins 2 8mm would have contributed to a device issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: a search of the medtech nonconformance (nc) quality system found no nc¿s associated with this product/lot combination.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SIGMA STAB GVF INS 2 8MM
Common Device Name
SIGMA KNEE PRIMARY : KNEE TIBIAL INSERT
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46581 0988
Manufacturer (Section G)
JTE WARSAW MFG SITE
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
elba bello
700 orthopaedic dr.
warsaw, IN 46581
9083863534
MDR Report Key22849162
Report Number1818910-2025-14539
Device Sequence Number4461548
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier10603295063926
UDI-Public(01)10603295063926(17)241110(10)D19110422
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StatePA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K033272
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/10/2024
Device Catalogue Number158121008
Device Lot NumberD19110422
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/05/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/26/2025
08/25/2025
12/18/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/20/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/27/2025
08/29/2025
12/19/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured09/07/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
PFC*SIGMA/OV DOME PAT 3 PEG, 32.; SIG MOD TIB TRAY CEM COCR 2.; SIGMA PS CEM FEM SZ3 R.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age49 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-