• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V. 2008T HD SYS. W/O CDX BLUE STAR; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V. 2008T HD SYS. W/O CDX BLUE STAR; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 191128
Medical Device Problem Code Thermal Decomposition of Device (1071)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/23/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity.
 
Event or Problem Description
A user facility biomedical technician (biomed) contacted fresenius technical support because a crit-line device was not passing the verification test on a 2008t hemodialysis machine.There was no patient involvement associated with the event.The biomed was requesting assistance to have the device verified.A fresenius field service technician (fst) was dispatched to the facility to evaluate the machine.The fst confirmed the crit-line device would not pass the verification test.The fst tried the crit-line device on other known good machines, and it would not pass the test on those machines either.During evaluation of the original machine in question, the fst found a burnt diode on the functional board.The fst said this diode controls the front usb port board.No other components were found to be damaged.To resolve the reported issue, the biomed replaced the usb port board and the functional board.There was no burning smell, and there were no signs of any smoke, sparks, or flames.The machine was plugged into a hospital grade ground-fault circuit interrupter (gfci) outlet and had no previous history of failing the electrical leakage test.At the time of the repair, the machine had 437 operating hours on it.The machine was returned to service upon completion of the repair.The crit-line was bagged by the customer and labeled with the message "do not use".The fst agreed to return the functional board for evaluation.A photo of the damaged functional board was provided for review.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: h3 plant investigation: although a sample was reported to be available for manufacturer evaluation, to date no parts have been received.However, an on-site evaluation was performed by a fresenius field service technician (fst).The fst found objective evidence indicating a product problem, and thus the complaint was confirmed.A records review was performed on the reported serial number.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no non-conformances, or any associated rework identified during the manufacturing process which could be related to the reported event.In addition, the device history record (dhr) review confirmed the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The reported event has been confirmed.
 
Event or Problem Description
A user facility biomedical technician (biomed) contacted fresenius technical support because a crit-line device was not passing the verification test on a 2008t hemodialysis machine.There was no patient involvement associated with the event.The biomed was requesting assistance to have the device verified.A fresenius field service technician (fst) was dispatched to the facility to evaluate the machine.The fst confirmed the crit-line device would not pass the verification test.The fst tried the crit-line device on other known good machines, and it would not pass the test on those machines either.During evaluation of the original machine in question, the fst found a burnt diode on the functional board.The fst said this diode controls the front usb port board.No other components were found to be damaged.To resolve the reported issue, the biomed replaced the usb port board and the functional board.There was no burning smell, and there were no signs of any smoke, sparks, or flames.The machine was plugged into a hospital grade ground-fault circuit interrupter (gfci) outlet and had no previous history of failing the electrical leakage test.At the time of the repair, the machine had 437 operating hours on it.The machine was returned to service upon completion of the repair.The crit-line was bagged by the customer and labeled with the message "do not use".The fst agreed to return the functional board for evaluation.A photo of the damaged functional board was provided for review.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d9, h3 plant investigation: the functional board was returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.The visual inspection of the returned sample showed there was thermal decomposition on the control coil (l16).Based on the sample evaluation, the reported event has been confirmed.
 
Event or Problem Description
A user facility biomedical technician (biomed) contacted fresenius technical support because a crit-line device was not passing the verification test on a 2008t hemodialysis machine.There was no patient involvement associated with the event.The biomed was requesting assistance to have the device verified.A fresenius field service technician (fst) was dispatched to the facility to evaluate the machine.The fst confirmed the crit-line device would not pass the verification test.The fst tried the crit-line device on other known good machines, and it would not pass the test on those machines either.During evaluation of the original machine in question, the fst found a burnt diode on the functional board.The fst said this diode controls the front usb port board.No other components were found to be damaged.To resolve the reported issue, the biomed replaced the usb port board and the functional board.There was no burning smell, and there were no signs of any smoke, sparks, or flames.The machine was plugged into a hospital grade ground-fault circuit interrupter (gfci) outlet and had no previous history of failing the electrical leakage test.At the time of the repair, the machine had 437 operating hours on it.The machine was returned to service upon completion of the repair.The crit-line was bagged by the customer and labeled with the message "do not use".The fst agreed to return the functional board for evaluation.A photo of the damaged functional board was provided for review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
2008T HD SYS. W/O CDX BLUE STAR
Common Device Name
DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V.
mike allen #1331
parque industrial reynosa
reynosa 88780
MX  88780
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V.
director, quality systems
900 w zaragosa drive suite d
pharr TX 78577
Manufacturer Contact
jessica trujillo
920 winter st
waltham, MA 02451
6174175172
MDR Report Key22856382
Report Number0008030665-2025-01964
Device Sequence Number18462996
Product Code KDI
UDI-Device Identifier00840861102105
UDI-Public00840861102105
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K173972
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/08/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number191128
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device AgeMO
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/30/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/21/2025
03/04/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/20/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/22/2025
03/08/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/09/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-