|
It was reported that the tip of the cook single-use holmium laser fiber broke off.Before the procedure, no issues were noted when the laser fiber was removed from the packaging and inspected.Therefore, the fiber was screwed without issue into the laser aperture and turned on.The laser beam made a perfect circle and the aperture was switched to 'ready'.During the procedure, the laser fiber broke up the kidney stone 'without issue for quite a while' before a staff person noted that part of the tip of the fiber had broken off.The fiber was removed, and the tip of the fiber was received by irrigating the kidney and bladder.The remaining parts of the kidney stone were removed with an unspecified stone extractor.No part of the tip of the laser fiber remained in the patient's body.The patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.
|
|
Additional information: d4 - primary udi number investigation ¿ evaluation event description: it was reported that the tip of the cook single-use holmium laser fiber broke off.Before the procedure, no issues were noted when the laser fiber was removed from the packaging and inspected.Therefore, the fiber was screwed without issue into the laser aperture and turned on.The laser beam made a perfect circle and the aperture was switched to 'ready'.During the procedure, the laser fiber broke up the kidney stone 'without issue for quite a while' before a staff person noted that part of the tip of the fiber had broken off.The fiber was removed, and the tip of the fiber was received by irrigating the kidney and bladder.The remaining parts of the kidney stone were removed with an unspecified stone extractor.No part of the tip of the laser fiber remained in the patient's body.The patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, device history record (dhr), quality control procedures, and instructions for use (ifu), as well as a visual inspection of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was returned to cook for evaluation.Upon visual inspection, the tip of the fiber was broken and had a jagged appearance.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the dhrs for the reported complaint device lot and the related subassembly lots revealed no recorded non-conformances relevant to the failure mode.A complaint history search identified no other events reported for the related failure mode.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu packaged with the device contains the following in relation to the reported failure mode: "warning.Do not bend fiber at sharp angles.Precautions.Never subject fiberoptics to sharp bends in handling, use, or storage.How supplied.Upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ based on the information provided, inspection of the returned device, and the results of the investigation, a potential root cause for this event could not be established.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|