| Catalog Number |
072211 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material (2944)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/11/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.Udi format updated with available product information per gudid.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that patient was there for a surgery.Surgeon always used two 10fr round drains (lot# ngkp0821).Surgeon opened two drains at beginning of case, both drains had fuzzy material on the drain in the sterile packaging.This has happened before.Surgeon switched and had to use 15fr drains which showed no contamination.No patient harm was reported.No physical sample was available.It was reported that patient was there for a surgery.Surgeon always used 10fr round drains with this surgery (lot# ngkp0821).Surgeon opened 3 different packages of sterile drains and all were unusable.They had fuzzy sticky stuff on drains and the third one had fuzzy substance and a hair inside the sterile packaging.Surgeon proceeded to use different size drain than needed due to this ongoing problem.No patient harm was reported.Physical sample was available.It was reported that physicians had several issues with 10f drains for a while (lot# ngjw3604).Wound drain had debris, powder- like substance on them.Very often the drains had small white pieces of plastic that are stuck to the clear portion of the drain.It was so frequent that physician had the staff check the tubing before inserting them.According to some, they saw this across drain sizes.Hospital users were not sure if something in the manufacturing changed.There had been two times that the drains did not function at the end of the case.After investigating, the same clear jell that was at the end of the drain by the trocar was filling the fluted part of the drain as well so it was not able to hold suction.Physician was having staff flush all the drains before placement and closed the incision, so they knew it function.It was reported that the customer stated that they have received additional complaints with that wound drain, as well as identified that this may affect multiple items not just the originally reported 072221.They need to set up a call, to discuss over that issue.They were looking at removing that product and others from inventory till they have an all clear.They mentioned impacted material below: material #072211, material #072190, material #072189, material #072214, material #072186.Per additional information received via email on 14aug2025, it was reported that they shared clinicians raised multiple concerns related to item 072221 and then inspected similar items at their distribution center and found fuzzy hair foreign matter in those items as well.There was no harm to a patient as these were found before use.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported event was confirmed cause unknown.Visual inspection noted foreign material measuring (0.25mm2) and located on the channel drain.This does not meet specification which states "product must be clean and free from oil or grease or loose foreign matter".The labeling is found to be adequate.A review of the device history record did not show any problems or conditions that would have contributed to the reported issue.No additional actions can be taken at this time.Correction: d,e,h.Udi format updated with available product information per gudid.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that patient was there for a surgery.Surgeon always used two 10fr round drains (lot# ngkp0821).Surgeon opened two drains at beginning of case, both drains had fuzzy material on the drain in the sterile packaging.This has happened before.Surgeon switched and had to use 15fr drains which showed no contamination.No patient harm was reported.No physical sample was available.It was reported that patient was there for a surgery.Surgeon always used 10fr round drains with this surgery (lot# ngkp0821).Surgeon opened 3 different packages of sterile drains and all were unusable.They had fuzzy sticky stuff on drains and the third one had fuzzy substance and a hair inside the sterile packaging.Surgeon proceeded to use different size drain than needed due to this ongoing problem.No patient harm was reported.Physical sample was available.It was reported that physicians had several issues with 10f drains for a while (lot# ngjw3604).Wound drain had debris, powder- like substance on them.Very often the drains had small white pieces of plastic that are stuck to the clear portion of the drain.It was so frequent that physician had the staff check the tubing before inserting them.According to some, they saw this across drain sizes.Hospital users were not sure if something in the manufacturing changed.There had been two times that the drains did not function at the end of the case.After investigating, the same clear jell that was at the end of the drain by the trocar was filling the fluted part of the drain as well so it was not able to hold suction.Physician was having staff flush all the drains before placement and closed the incision, so they knew it function.It was reported that the customer stated that they have received additional complaints with that wound drain, as well as identified that this may affect multiple items not just the originally reported 072221.They need to set up a call, to discuss over that issue.They were looking at removing that product and others from inventory till they have an all clear.They mentioned impacted material below: material #072211, material #072190, material #072189, material #072214, material #072186.Per additional information received via email on 14aug2025, it was reported that they shared clinicians raised multiple concerns related to item 072221 and then inspected similar items at their distribution center and found fuzzy hair foreign matter in those items as well.There was no harm to a patient as these were found before use.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|