• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DCB00
Medical Device Problem Code Mechanical Problem (1384)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Disturbances (2140)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a preloaded monofocal intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from a patient 's left eye as the eyes were not working well together due to a mechanical complication.The replacement lens was the same model but higher diopter (22.0d).The incision was enlarged and suture used.No medications outside of the standard of care was required.No patient injury was reported.The patient outcome is not available.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section b3: date of event: unknown/ not provided.The best estimate date is between jun 2, 2025 and jun 16, 2025.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of this review, if there is any further relevant information, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Section h6: health effect - impact code: 4625 - suture an attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, the information was not available.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: sep 30, 2025.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection of the complaint device reveal that the lens was received cut in half, coated in viscoelastic residue, and stuck together.The lens halves were unstuck and cleaned revealing no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue reported.The complaint issue "dc-mechanical issues" was not identified during product evaluation.The observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the investigation, no malfunction or product deficiency was identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key22877665
Report Number3012236936-2025-000222
Device Sequence Number5688198
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474636071
UDI-Public(01)05050474636071(17)280107
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOR
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/19/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDCB00
Device Catalogue NumberDCB0000195
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/30/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/28/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/22/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/18/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/07/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-