| Catalog Number |
AVSM08100 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding (1888); Restenosis (4576)
|
| Date of Event |
04/30/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.Section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial that approximately five months and three days post index procedure using a covera vascular covered stent in the right upper arm on the cephalic vein target lesion, the subject had a re-intervention performed by using standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, on the target lesion within the access circuit with initial stenosis of 70% and final residual stenosis of 0%, and on a new lesion within the access circuit with initial stenosis of 60% and final residual stenosis of 0%.Furthermore, the re-intervention was successful, no new access was created, and the current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.However, the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product, and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Investigation summary: the stent remains implanted.No x-ray images were provided for evaluation.In this case pre dilation as well as post dilation was performed; there was no report of any specific device deficiencies or malfunctions during or after the initial procedure.Based on the information available no indications were found that the covera vascular covered stent used in the initial procedure was causally related to the reported issues or re-interventions.Based on the information available, the investigation is closed with inconclusive result.No indications were found that the covera vascular covered stent used in the initial procedure was causally related to the reported issues or re-interventions.No specific device deficiencies or malfunctions were reported during or after the initial procedure.A definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: the relevant labeling for this product was reviewed.It was found that the instructions for use (ifu) sufficiently address the potential risk.Based on the instructions for use complications and adverse events associated with the use of the covera vascular covered stent may include the usual complications associated with endovascular stent and covered stent placement and dialysis shunt revisions, which includes prolonged bleeding, and restenosis of the target vessel.Regarding pta the instructions for use states: "pre-dilate the stenosis with a pta balloon catheter of appropriate length and diameter for the lesion to be treated.¿ and ¿post dilate the covered stent with an angioplasty balloon sized appropriately as to ensure complete wall apposition to the reference vessel.Avoid balloon dilation in the healthy, non-stenosed segment of the vein.¿ b5, g3, h6 (method).Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial that approximately five months and three days post index procedure using a covera vascular covered stent in the right upper arm on the cephalic vein target lesion, the subject had a re-intervention performed by using standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, on the target lesion within the access circuit with initial stenosis of 70% and final residual stenosis of 0%, and on a new lesion within the access circuit with initial stenosis of 60% and final residual stenosis of 0%.It was further reported that stenosis was identified in the target lesion, with initial stenosis % of 45.9% and the final residual stenosis post re-intervention was 10%.Furthermore, the re-intervention was successful, no new access was created, and the current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|