| Model Number |
40495 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/25/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
E1: initial reporter facility name: (b)(6) medical university.E1: phone number: (b)(6) reported here as phone number exceeded character limit for designated field.Good faith effort attempts were made to try and retrieve additional details regarding the initial reporter details, but further information was unable to be obtained.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The strength of the soft tip of the guide wire was insufficient.On (b)(6) 2025, a patient was treated for left iliac vein compression syndrome using a 300cm, 8cm poly tip v-18 control wire with a hydrophilic coating and a single-curved angiography catheter.During the procedure, it was noted that the guide wire was fractured.The device was removed, and the procedure was completed.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The strength of the soft tip of the guide wire was insufficient.On (b)(6) 2025, a patient was treated for left iliac vein compression syndrome using a 300cm, 8cm poly tip v-18 control wire with a hydrophilic coating and a single-curved angiography catheter.During the procedure, it was noted that the guide wire was fractured.The device was removed, and the procedure was completed.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
E1 - initial reporter: updated the physician details e1: (b)6).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The strength of the soft tip of the guide wire was insufficient.On (b)(6) 2025, a patient was treated for left iliac vein compression syndrome using a 300cm, 8cm poly tip v-18 control wire with a hydrophilic coating and a single-curved angiography catheter.During the procedure, it was noted that the guide wire was fractured.The device was removed, and the procedure was completed.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
E1 - initial reporter: updated the physician details.E1: initial reporter facility name: (b)(6).The device was not returned.However, a photo was provided from the healthcare facility.It shows that the distal tip was detached.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|