|
COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® COLONIC CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MQR, STENT, COLONIC, METALLIC, EXPANDABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
G48028 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Twisted/Bent (2981); Activation Failure (3270)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/07/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Significant resistance was encountered during the release process , then the sheath was bent, replaced with a new product and completed the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Additional information received on 25aug2025 at what stage of the procedure did the complaint occur? during stent placement.When unpacking or preparing the evolution, while inserting the evolution in the patient, during stent placement, while removing the introduce, during stent repositioning/removal.What endoscope type and channel size was used? olympus colonoscopy details of the wire guide used (diameter, type, make)? yellow zebra wire guide did any part of the stent contact the patient's anatomy when the complaint occurred? yes what was the target location? intestinal obstruction.Did the patient exhibit difficult anatomy (n/a, tortuous, altered)?if altered please indicate the procedure type (e.G., cholodochjejunostomy) n/a were any other defects (other than the complaint issue) observed on the delivery system (e.G., kinks) prior to return? (if yes, please specify what additional defect(s) were observed and where on the device this was observed) no.Was the yellow marker kept in view during deployment? yes are images of the device or procedure available? no.Was the product inspected for kinks or damage before use? no.Please provide the status of the device returned.Device will be returned.Was resistance encountered while advancing the wire to the target location? no.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the completion of the investigation on 02-oct-2025.Investigation - evaluation.Device evaluation: the evo-25-30-8-c device of c2232272 lot number involved in this complaint was returned, with its opened original packaging.With the information provided, a physical examination and document based investigation was conducted.Lab evaluation: the device involved in the complaint was evaluated in the laboratory on the 08th sep 2025.The lab evaluation notes, and lab attendance can be viewed in the ¿product returns¿ object.Visual inspection: device returned in protective tubing.Direction button is in the recapture position.Red marker is on the 03rd dimple, before ponr.Safety wire returned in place.Outer sheath examined and it appears to be intact.Functional inspection: handle actuating fine for deployment and recapture.Stent deployed without any issues.Safety wire removed without any issues.Stent examined and no issues observed.The reported failure was not observed as clinical setting could not be replicated.Manufacturing records review: prior to distribution, all evo-25-30-8-c devices are subjected to functional checks and visual inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records for evo-25-30-8-c device of lot number c2232272 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.Historical data review: a review of the manufacturing records for the evo-25-30-8-c device confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred with the current lot number.Based on the information available to date, there is no evidence to suggest that there are any manufacturing issues associated with lot number c2232272.Instructions for use and/label review: it should be noted that as per ifu0052 which accompanies this device instructs the user to inspect the device prior to use : "visually inspect with particular attention to kinks, bends and breaks.If an abnormality is detected that would prohibit proper working condition, do not use".There is evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.From additional information provided the product was not inspected for kinks or damage before use.Therefore, as per section 6.6.3 of d00348426 rev007 these events have been documented in the pms log.Image review: image provided by customer show outer box of device.Root cause analysis: definitive root cause could not be determined.Based on the information provided, the potential root cause appears to be related to the tortuous patient anatomy and the possible compression or bending of the outer sheath during deployment.This could have led to a build-up of pressure and increased resistance during the release process.It's noteworthy that the returned device functioned as intended and no bends were observed during evaluation, which suggests that the issue may have been related to the deployment environment rather than a device defect.As per complaint description, "significant resistance was encountered during the release process".Confirmation of complaint the complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.Corrective action/correction: complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for similar events.Summary of investigation: according to the customer, the sheath was bent.Significant resistance was encountered during the release process , confirmed quantity, 01 device was confirmed used.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation findings conclude that issue reported was likely due to the torturous patient anatomy.Based on the information provided, the potential root cause appears to be related to the tortuous patient anatomy and the possible compression or bending of the outer sheath during deployment.This could have led to a build-up of pressure and increased resistance during the release process.It's noteworthy that the returned device functioned as intended and no bends were observed during evaluation, which suggests that the issue may have been related to the deployment environment rather than a device defect.As per complaint description, "significant resistance was encountered during the release process".Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for similar events.The complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the completion of the investigation on 02-oct-2025.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|