MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SÃ RL HD C-MNT SCP,2.7,30,75,MITEK; ARTHROSCOPE

Catalog Number	242276
Medical Device Problem Codes	Display or Visual Feedback Problem (1184); Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event	08/21/2025
Type of Reportable Event	Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: d4: the device expiration date is currently unavailable.H4: the device manufacture date is currently unavailable.As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an unspecified surgery, it was observed that the hd c-mnt scp,2.7,30,75, mitek device focus ring was sticking and the picture on the screen was going out of focus when the surgeon spun the light cord.It was reported that the scope was swapped out with a different lens.There was a one to minute delay in the procedure reported.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: device history review: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device serial number (b)(6), and no non-conformance was identified.The complaint device was received at the service center and evaluated.During the service evaluation the following defects were identified: - other damages caused by customer - outer tube damaged, needle scratches - outer tube damaged, distal tip distal tip damaged dings/scratches - illumination distal tip fiber damaged - particulate, optics particulate in system - optical system, optical components distal cover glass/negative damaged scratches proximal cover glass damaged residue - cosmetic issue scratches/dents - engraving/identification\datamatrix code level a labeling : illegible etch, visual : deformed/bent, broken (2+ pieces) : chipped/shaved/delaminated, visual : scratched/nicked per service reports, this complaint was confirmed.The defective parts need to be replaced to resolve the issues.Based on the investigation findings, the potential root cause is traced to user error.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed and there is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: h4: the device manufacture date was reported as unknown in the initial report.Please note that the date of manufacture has been updated accordingly.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: investigation summary the complaint device was received at the service center and evaluated.During the service evaluation the following defects were identified: - other damages caused by customer - outer tube damaged, needle scratches - outer tube damaged, distal tip distal tip damaged dings/scratches - illumination distal tip fiber damaged - particulate, optics particulate in system - optical system, optical components distal cover glass/negative damaged scratches proximal cover glass damaged residue - cosmetic issue scratches/dents - engraving/identification\datamatrix code level a labeling : illegible etch, visual : deformed/bent, broken (2+ pieces) : chipped/shaved/delaminated, visual : scratched/nicked per service report, this complaint was confirmed.The faulty parts were replaced to resolve the issues.After repair, the device was found to be working according to the specifications.Based on the investigation findings, the potential root cause is traced to user error.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed and there is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device serial number, and no non-conformance was identified.

• Brand Name: HD C-MNT SCP,2.7,30,75,MITEK
• Common Device Name: ARTHROSCOPE
• Manufacturer (Section D): MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SÃ RL; chemin-blanc 38; le locle 02400 ; SZ 02400
• Manufacturer (Section G): MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL; chemin-blanc 38; le locle CH-24 00; SZ CH-2400
• Manufacturer Contact: kate karberg ; 325 paramount drive; raynham, MA ; 3035526892
• MDR Report Key: 22901897
• Report Number: 1221934-2025-03307
• Device Sequence Number: 8851276
• Product Code: HRX
• UDI-Device Identifier: 10886705032143
• UDI-Public: (01)10886705032143
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: CO
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: K080560
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): Unknown
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: User Facility,Company Representative
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Other
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 08/27/2025

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: No
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: Yes
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Catalogue Number: 242276
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: Device Returned to Manufacturer
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: No
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 08/21/2025
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 09/01/2025; 10/24/2025; 11/21/2025
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 08/27/2025
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 09/02/2025; 10/28/2025; 11/21/2025
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Yes
• Date Device Manufactured: 09/20/2023
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Unknown
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Patient Sex: Unknown