| Catalog Number |
0502937030 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fogging (1253); Moisture or Humidity Problem (2986)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/30/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information will be provided once the investigation has been completed.The device manufacturer date is not known at this time.However, should it become available it will be provided in future reports.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that fogging was noticed during the surgical procedure.Initially, after insertion into the peritoneal cavity, visualization was normal.Despite our attempts, we were unable to improve the image quality.After replacing the optics, the image returned to normal.The patient was a 66-year-old female weighing 66 kg.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Three attempts have been made to retrieve the device for evaluation, and it is yet to be received in-house.No further attempts to retrieve the device are required.This complaint investigation was closed based on the device not received, therefore the reported failure mode was not confirmed.In the event that the device is received, the complaint will be reopened and the investigation will be updated with new results.Alleged failure: fogging.Probable root cause: laser welding seal failure.Distal/proximal window solder failure.Damage to optical train.Damage to needle.Damage to distal or proximal windows.Moisture intrusion.End of life wear-out.Environmental disturbance: endoscope colder than dew point.Environmental disturbance: fluid entrapment between the coupler and eyepiece junction (eyepiece only).Use error.The reported failure mode will be monitored for future reoccurrence.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that fogging was noticed during the surgical procedure.Initially, after insertion into the peritoneal cavity, visualization was normal.Despite our attempts, we were unable to improve the image quality.After replacing the optics, the image returned to normal.The patient was a 66-year-old female weighing 66 kg.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product has now been physically received at stryker endoscopy, usa.Investigation as follows is now based on product received.Alleged failure: the visibility issue/fogging was noticed during the surgical procedure.Initially, after insertion into the peritoneal cavity, visualization was normal.Despite our attempts, we were unable to improve the image quality.After replacing the optics, the image returned to normal.The patient was a 66-year-old female weighing 66 kg.Surgical procedure: laparoscopic fundoplication.The optics leaks - the moisture is inside the optics and not outside.The failure(s) identified in the investigation is consistent with the complaint record.The probable root causes could be misaligned inner lenses, rough handling during sterilization and/or product transport.The product was returned for investigation and the failure mode will be monitored for future reoccurrence.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that fogging was noticed during the surgical procedure.Initially, after insertion into the peritoneal cavity, visualization was normal.Despite our attempts, we were unable to improve the image quality.After replacing the optics, the image returned to normal.The patient was a 66-year-old female weighing 66 kg.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|