• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ3 INFINITY ADAPTIS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ3 INFINITY ADAPTIS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 33680003
Medical Device Problem Codes Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 08/01/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient underwent a revision surgery where a cement spacer was implanted.The reason for the revision is not available at the time of this report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the available information the device will not be returned therefore an evaluation of the device cannot be performed.A review of the device history is not possible because the lot number was not communicated.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Correction to h6 (device code).Additional devices used: catalog: 33680023 - lot/serial: (b)(6) - infinity adaptis taldome sz3 infinity adaptis.Catalog: 33683306 - lot/serial: (b)(6) - infinity everlast sz 3 6mm total ankle system.The reported event could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation, and no other evidence was provided.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Upon further investigation of the ct scans, healthcare professionals opined that- the ct scan shows and confirms the presence of a cement spacer at the site of the former ankle joint prosthesis.There is no further clinical information provided and therefore nothing can be said to the clinical situation in this case.Usually, a cement spacer is used when there is an infection.The initial operation took place in summer 2024 and therefore a connection to the implant or the implantation is not too likely.However, failure of total ankle replacement tar over time is a known complication.In case of a planned revision procedure a medical opinion aiming to determine the root cause of the failure is part of the internal investigation process.Sufficient radiological and clinical information must be provided to enable a meaningful clinical assessment and to identify possible causes of failure.In cases where a ct scan is the only available clinical source, this assessment is limited.No conclusive statement can be provided, because key clinical information e.G., clinical status, exact symptoms, and range of motion of the patient, assessment of the treating physician is missing.The root causes of radiographic findings such as radiolucent areas and bone cysts are often complex and multifactorial and cannot be determined scientifically without this decisive evidence.Due to these limitations, we are unable in such cases to provide statements about the patient, the procedure and or the device in relation to cause of the failure.More detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available to determine the root cause of the complaint event.If the device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient underwent a revision surgery where a cement spacer was implanted.The reason for the revision is not available at the time of this report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ3 INFINITY ADAPTIS
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
dannielle stap
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key22912505
Report Number3010667733-2025-00984
Device Sequence Number15749154
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00889797069656
UDI-Public(01)00889797069656(11)230712(17)310712(10)1764193
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryNZ
PMA/510(K) Number
K181557
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/17/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number33680003
Device Lot Number1764193
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/01/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/20/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/28/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/17/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured07/12/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-