| Lot Number |
02915H25 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/05/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that balloon rupture occurred.The 90% stenosed target lesion was an area of in-stent restenosis (isr) located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified superficial femoral artery.A 6.0 x 200 mm 200cm ranger (dcb) balloon catheter was selected for use.During the procedure, the balloon ruptured at 14 atmospheres.The device was removed without any problem, and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluated by mfr: the ranger was returned for analysis.A visual examination identified that the balloon was not folded which indicates that the balloon was subjected to positive pressure.The returned device was attached to an encore inflation unit.Positive pressure was applied when di water was observed to be leaking from a balloon pinhole located approximately 1mm distal from the proximal markerband.As per ifu the rated burst pressure for this device is 14 atmospheres.The markerbands and tip section of the device were visually examined, and no issues were noted with the markerbands or tip of the device.A visual and tactile examination of the hypotube shaft found no issues with the shaft.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that balloon rupture occurred.The 90% stenosed target lesion was an area of in-stent restenosis (isr) located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified superficial femoral artery.A 6.0 x 200 mm 200cm ranger (dcb) balloon catheter was selected for use.During the procedure, the balloon ruptured at 14 atmospheres.The device was removed without any problem, and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that balloon rupture occurred.The 90% stenosed target lesion was an area of in-stent restenosis (isr) located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified superficial femoral artery.A 6.0 x 200 mm 200cm ranger (dcb) balloon catheter was selected for use.During the procedure, the balloon ruptured at 14 atmospheres.The device was removed without any problem, and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation results: device evaluated by mfr: the ranger device was returned to our post market quality assurance laboratory.A visual examination identified that the balloon was not folded which indicates that the balloon was subjected to positive pressure.The returned device was attached to an encore inflation unit.Positive pressure was applied when di water was observed to be leaking from a balloon pinhole located approximately 1mm distal from the proximal markerband.As per ifu the rated burst pressure for this device is 14 atmospheres.The markerbands and tip section of the device were visually examined, and no issues were noted with the markerbands or tip of the device.A visual and tactile examination of the hypotube shaft found no issues with the shaft.Device history record: it was confirmed this device met manufacturing specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.Labeling review: review of the instructions for use (ifu) confirmed that the content was sufficient and did not contribute to the reported event; therefore, no updates are required to the document at this time.Risk review: a risk review performed for the ranger device confirmed that the reported event is a known event defined in the product's risk management documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefits for the product.Investigation conclusion: based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of adverse event related to patient condition.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|