| Model Number |
VTICM5_12.1 (-5.5/3.0) |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
06/03/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6 - work order search: no additional similar complaint type events within associated lots were found.Secondary surgical intervention to remove/replace/reposition the lens is identified in the labeling as a known potential adverse event following icl implantation.Claim # (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The reporter indicated that following an implantable collamer lens (icl) implantation procedure, the patient experienced lens rotation.Due to lens rotation, the lens was repositioned.This did not resolve the issue.The lens was exchanged for a different model but same length lens.The problem was resolved.Cause of the event was reported as unknown.It has been noted that the surgeon selected a different lens size than that initially suggested by the icl calculation software.Therefore, there is not enough safety and effectiveness data to support implantation in this patient category.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
B5 - the reporter indicated that following an implantable collamer lens (icl) implantation procedure, the patient experienced lens rotation.Due to lens rotation, the lens was repositioned.This did not resolve the issue.The lens was exchanged for a different model but same length lens.The problem was resolved.Cause of the event was reported as unknown.It has been noted that the surgeon selected a different lens size than that initially suggested by the icl calculation software.H6 - health effect - clinical code (e): 4581 rotation.H6 - type of investigation 3331 - device history record (dhr) review: based on the results of the investigation, all released devices from the associated work order(s), including the suspected device, have been manufactured within established process parameters and there is no indication that the manufacturing and processing of the device contributed to the complaint issue.Claim # (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6: type of investigation 3331 - device history record (dhr) review in supp1 corrected to device evaluation: the lens was returned with moisture in a micocentrifuge vial.Visual inspection found lens haptic bent.Dimensional inspection found the lens to be within specifications.Claim # (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|