• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET 3I TSX IMPLANT, 4.7MMD, 13MML; DENTAL IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET 3I TSX IMPLANT, 4.7MMD, 13MML; DENTAL IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number TSX47B13
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Nerve Damage (1979); Numbness (2415)
Date of Event 08/12/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Zimvie complaint number (b)(4).A4: weight unknown / not provided.Customer has indicated that the product is in process of being returned to zimvie for investigation.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient was still numb after five (5) days post operatively.The implant at tooth site #20 was removed due to nerve injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted to relay additional information and device evaluation.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: type of investigation codes were added: 4109, 4111 and 3331.H6: investigation findings code was added: 213.H6: investigation conclusions code was added: 4315.H10: narrative/data was updated.Zimvie did not receive the reported implant for evaluation.Visual inspection could not be performed.The investigation has been performed based on the available information using the item number, device history record (dhr) review, and risk management file (rmf).Functional testing to recreate the reported event could not be performed due to the nature of the device & event.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation is inadequate treatment planning.Therefore, based on the available information, device malfunction could not be verified.Without device receipt, the reported event is non-verifiable.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the product was nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional event information received at the time of this report.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional event information received at the time of this report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted to relay additional information and device evaluation.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.D9: device availability and return date were updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: investigation conclusions code was added: 67.H10: narrative/data was updated.Zimvie received the reported implant for evaluation.Visual evaluation of the as returned device identified the implant with signs of use, and minor apparent debris attached to external threads.However, no apparent damage / malfunction that would cause or contribute to the reported event was identified.Measurements match drawing.Functional testing to recreate the reported event could not be performed due to the nature of the device & event.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation is inadequate treatment planning.Therefore, based on the available information, device malfunction did not occur.The reported event was non-verifiable with all the available information.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the product was nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TSX IMPLANT, 4.7MMD, 13MML
Common Device Name
DENTAL IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET 3I
4555 riverside drive
palm beach gardens FL 33410
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET 3I
4555 riverside drive
palm beach gardens FL 33410
Manufacturer Contact
carlos gordian-arroyo
4555 riverside drive
palm beach gardens, FL 33410
5619713230
MDR Report Key22926808
Report Number0001038806-2025-02058
Device Sequence Number18432307
Product Code DZE
UDI-Device Identifier00844868045175
UDI-Public(01)00844868045175(17)291107(10)2120022271
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K220978
Exemption Number5645646
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/16/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Other
Device Catalogue NumberTSX47B13
Device Lot Number2120022271
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/29/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/07/2025
10/16/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/08/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexUnknown
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-