• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS SIMPLICITY; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS SIMPLICITY; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DRN00V
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Halo (2227)
Date of Event 12/17/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of this review, if there is any further relevant information, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a preloaded multifocal intraocular lens (iol) was explanted in a secondary surgical procedure due to the patient experiencing halos.The issue was identified during a post-operative exam.A non-johnson & johnson lens of lower diopter (20.0d) was implanted in the patient¿s right eye as a replacement.No unplanned vitrectomy, sutures or incision enlargement required and no delay in procedure reported.There was no patient injury or any complications such as capsule tear reported.No medical attention were required and no medications prescribed.Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (bscva) pre-operative: 20/20, bscva post-operative: 20/20.The patient has fully recovered.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: sep 29, 2025.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection of the complaint device reveal that the lens was cut in half and coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned and inspected and damage was observed on the edge of one haptic.The complaint issues were not identified during product evaluation.The observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the investigation, no malfunction or product deficiency was identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key22926897
Report Number3012236936-2025-000229
Device Sequence Number9116641
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474810785
UDI-Public(01)05050474810785(17)270630
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/22/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDRN00V
Device Catalogue NumberDRN00V0210
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/06/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/15/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/29/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/21/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/30/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age57 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight53 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-