| Model Number |
4555 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fracture (1260); Defective Device (2588)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/14/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If pertinent information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this left ventricular (lv) lead was surgically abandoned due to an unknown product performance issue.Additional information is being requested from the field.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this left ventricular (lv) lead was surgically abandoned due to an unknown product performance issue.Additional information is being requested from the field.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received that the reason this lv lead was surgically abandoned was due to fracture.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If pertinent information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this left ventricular (lv) lead was surgically abandoned due to an unknown product performance issue.Additional information is being requested from the field.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received that the reason this lv lead was surgically abandoned was due to fracture.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This electrode was not returned for analysis as it surgically abandoned; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of known inherent risk of device.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of inappropriate shock was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|