• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Material Opacification (1426)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/12/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section a-6 patient race: decline to answer.Section d-6a date implanted: not applicable as the iol was not implanted.Section d-6b date explanted: not applicable as the iol was not implanted; therefore, not explanted.Section h-3 device evaluated by manufacturer: the complaint device was not returned for evaluation as it was discarded.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch report will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
An opacity in the optic of the dib00 model intraocular lens (iol) was noted after it's implantation in the patient¿s ocular dexter (right eye).There was no incision enlargement, no serious patient injury, no sutures, no vitrectomy, and the same procedure was completed successfully using another dib00 23.0 iol.Patient prognosis post-procedure was reported as excellent.The suspect iol is not available for return as it was discarded however, photos of the lens were provided.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information - photo device evaluation: no suspect product was received; however, a photo and video were provided by the customer.The photo shows the suspect lens inside the patient's eye, and two triangle-shaped damage can be observed on the center of the lens.Due to no product being received, no further evaluation could be performed.Complaint issue "dc-inclusions" was not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.The manufacturing records for the product were reviewed; the units were released in accordance with specifications.A search of complaints revealed that one (01) additional complaint folder was found as part of this production order (po) number ¿ stuck in cartridge.These complaint issues reported are not related.Based on complaint history review (chr) results, no further actions are required.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key22948593
Report Number3012236936-2025-000232
Device Sequence Number21230317
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731820
UDI-Public(01)05050474731820(17)280619
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNC
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/21/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0230
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/12/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/15/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/02/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/20/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured06/19/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-