• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Contamination (1120)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/07/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2025, during the implantation of a preloaded monofocal tecnis eyhance intraocular lens in the patient's right eye, the surgeon identified debris or a particle on the lens.The object was removed, and the surgery was completed without further intervention.No additional information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a3, a4, a5 and a6: unknown; information not provided.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: unknown, information not provided.Section h3: other 81: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: september 10, 2025.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification was performed on the suspect product and found a small dark particle was inside a specimen cup.The simplicity device was inspected, and no further particles were observed in the cartridge, lens module, or on the plunger rod or handpiece.The complaint issue "foreign material - loose" was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.No nonconformity report, documentation or labeling changes, and further escalations are required.Johnson & johnson surgical vision will continue to monitor these types of complaints.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: october 28, 2025.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the suspect product was received.Visual inspection under magnification was performed on the suspect product and found a small dark particle inside a specimen cup.The simplicity device was inspected, and no further particles were observed in the cartridge, lens module, or on the plunger rod or handpiece.The particle was forwarded to laboratory to analyze the received particle.Per laboratory, the material was a mixture primarily containing 316 stainless steel and calcium phosphate.As the foreign material was inorganic/metallic, sem (scanning electron microscopy) analysis was used.Due to nature of the particle a qualitative/ quantitative analysis could not be performed, therefore it could not be confirmed if the particle resulted from any manufacturing process or device design.The manufacturing records for the production order were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specifications.No process deviations (dev), nonconformances (nc/nr), or capas were found as part of this manufacturing records review.Based on the investigation with the available information, no malfunction or product deficiency could be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key22957432
Report Number3012236936-2025-000231
Device Sequence Number8405151
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731813
UDI-Public(01)05050474731813(17)280626
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/02/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/07/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/14/2025
11/19/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/03/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/05/2025
12/02/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/26/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-