| Catalog Number |
CMC1434P |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/02/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that two roi-c cages fractured intra-operatively at c6/7 while implanting the superior plates before locking.The plates were misaligned despite using the awl successfully.The level above had a previous plate/screw construct and the procedure was an extension of the previously successful fusion.The procedure was ultimately completed using a competitive product.There was no patient impact; however, there was a 60 minute delay.This is report two of two for this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D10: 2x roi-c long anchoring plates (mc1006t), 1x unknown roi-c inserter.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.A follow up report will be sent upon completion of the device evaluation.Reference report 3004788213-2025-00051.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that two roi-c cages fractured intra-operatively at c6/7 while implanting the superior plates before locking.The plates were misaligned despite using the awl successfully.The level above had a previous plate/screw construct and the procedure was an extension of the previously successful fusion.The procedure was ultimately completed using a competitive product.There was no patient impact; however, there was a 60 minute delay.This is report two of two for this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3: "device evaluation anticipated, but not yet begun" is erroneous and no longer applies.The device was evaluated.H6: additional method code: 4109 corrections in h3.Additional information in h6: investigation type, findings, and conclusions.Device evaluation: the returned device matches the information in the complaint file and was examined.Visual inspection revealed the cage has fractured.Root cause: this event could possibly be attributed to incorrect use of the awl, resulting in misalignment of the plates and excessive forces being applied to the cage.Dhr review: the dhr was reviewed.There are no indications of manufacturing issues which would have contributed to this event and the device was likely conforming when it left highridge medical¿s control.Device usage: this device is used for treatment.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report, a follow-up report will be sent.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|