| Model Number |
0684-00-0470-01 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Failure to Recalibrate (1517); Failure to Sense (1559)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/14/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product has been returned to the manufacturer, but is pending investigation.Once the investigation is completed a supplemental report with our findings will be submitted.Complaint record id (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during intra aortic balloon (iab) therapy there were intermittent reading showing diastole to be zero, customer tried to re-calibrate the pressure but still the same.Asked them to take off the fibre optic sensor, use their own transducer, the problem was solved.User suspects problem for the fibre optic sensor, now the goods will be sent back for further investigation.There was no patient harm or injury reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
N/a.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Updated fields: b4, g1, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6 (type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusion), h11.The iab was returned with the membrane completely unfolded and blood on the exterior of the catheter and between the catheter and the sheath.The one-way valve, extender and pressure tubing were also returned.A sensor output test was performed and the sensor was found to be within specification.The reported events cannot be confirmed by the evaluation.A lot history record review was completed for the reported product.No nonconformances were found that are considered to be related to the event.The failure mode is addressed in the risk file and is operating within its risk profile.The ifu addresses the reported failure.The device meets all product specifications.There were no ncmrs identified which could cause or contribute to the reported failure.The investigation does not indicate that the device was inadvertently released as non-conforming or an adulterated product or was a counterfeit.The complaint history review did not identify an adverse trend (increase in number of complaints over past three (3) months).Based on the rational provided above, no escalation to the capa process is required.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|