• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY THRU-LUMEN EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY THRU-LUMEN EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 12TLW805F35
Medical Device Problem Code Material Fragmentation (1261)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Patient demographics unable to be obtained.One fogarty embolectomy catheter was received by our product evaluation laboratory for a full evaluation.As received, the balloon the balloon was found to be ruptured at central area.The balloon edges did not appear to match at the ruptured region.Per the ifu "balloon rupture and catheter separation as a result of excessive pull force applied to remove adherent material are the most frequent causes of reported failures." and "to minimize the risk of vessel damage, balloon rupture, or tip detachment, do not exceed the maximum recommended inflation and pull force for each size catheter (see specification table)".No other visible damage was observed from the catheter body and windings.Through lumen was patent without any leakage or occlusion.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during the test of this fogarty embolectomy catheter, the balloon burst.There was no allegation of patient injury.The device was available for evaluation.Patient demographics unable to be obtained.As per evaluation findings, the balloon was found to be ruptured at the central area.Balloon edges did not appear to match at the ruptured region.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Added information to section h6 (type of investigation).Updated section h6 (impact code).H6 (component code), h6 (investigation findings) and h6 (investigations conclusions).The manufacturing records were reviewed for the lot involved and there is no indication of a related nonconformance.All process parameters were met and inspections passed successfully.Based on the available information there is no evidence that supports or confirms the failure mode being evaluated to be associated to a manufacturing or design defect.As part of the manufacturing process a 100% of the units go through balloon and winding inspection.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FOGARTY THRU-LUMEN EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER
Common Device Name
CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
parque industrial de itabo
anasco
Manufacturer Contact
samantha eveleigh
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492503939
MDR Report Key23002022
Report Number2015691-2025-07394
Device Sequence Number8806783
Product Code DXE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103043532
UDI-Public(01)00690103043532(17)261002(11)240703(10)65808269
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K240078
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/13/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Expiration Date10/02/2026
Device Model Number12TLW805F35
Device Lot Number65808269
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/11/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/19/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/10/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/09/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/15/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/03/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-