|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Correction: d4 investigation ¿ evaluation it was reported that during an intrauterine embryo transfer surgery, upon opening the package of a guardia access nano embryo transfer catheter a hair was found inside.The procedure was completed by using another new device.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The complainant has not reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), manufacturer¿s instructions (mi), and quality control (qc) procedures were conducted during the investigation.Visual inspection of the returned complaint device was also conducted.One device was returned for investigation.Visual exam notes foreign matter in the end seal of the pouch.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no related quality control discrepancies reported for this failure mode.A complaint history database search showed no other complaints associated with the failure mode for the complaint device lot.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the device was manufactured out of specification and that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu supplied with the device did not provide any information related to the reported issue.Based upon the available information, inspection of the returned device, and results of the investigation, cook has concluded that the cause for the complaint was due to a quality control deficiency.Complaint awareness training has been completed for the relevant personnel.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints per the risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|