|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT DUO M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX DUAL-LUMEN, 9.5F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
1829570 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Obstruction of Flow (2423); Blocked Connection (2888)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/20/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.Section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that post port placement, the patient was concerned that there is a blocked product at the tip of catheter for an occlusion and further reportedly the patient allegedly asking more relevant information about port's flushing volumes.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A patient underwent for port placement procedure using powerport duo m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex dual-lumen, 9.5f.It was reported that post port placement, the patient was concerned that there is a blocked product at the tip of catheter for an occlusion and further reportedly the patient allegedly asking more relevant information about port's flushing volumes.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported obstruction of flow issue as no objective evidence was provided for review.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.G3, h6 (device, component).Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|