| Catalog Number |
0010215 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240)
|
| Date of Event |
12/09/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per information provided: (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with ventral hernia thereby underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic repair with implant of ventrio mesh (device 1 and 2).Per op notes, "the ventrio mesh (device 1 and 2) was placed and tacked." (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with ventral hernia thereby underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic repair.Per op notes, "extensive lysis of adhesions was performed.The previous mesh (device 1 and 2) was found well incorporated on prolene side than the gortex side.The upper part of mesh was lifted, and a small hernia was identified.A primary suture repair was done.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jun-2018) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr represents the bard ventrio mesh (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard ventrio mesh (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|