• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9755RSL20A
Medical Device Problem Code Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Foreign Body Embolism (4439)
Date of Event 08/22/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
As reported by the field clinical specialist, the temporary pacemaker was turned off before the commander balloon was deflated causing the 20mm sapien 3 ultra resilia valve to pop out of the annulus.The team was able to deploy the valve in the descending aorta.A new valve was opened and successfully deployed in the annulus.The patient was alive at the end of the procedure.The valve was successfully implanted.There was no central leak.There was no allegation of edwards device deficiency, as the team agreed that the valve embolized due to pacing stopping prematurely.It was turned off too early because the operator told them to stop pacing before the balloon was down.The delivery system balloon was mostly inflated when the pacer was turned off.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Per the instructions for use (ifu), valve embolization is a known potential adverse event associated with the transcatheter valve replacement (tvr) procedure.There are multiple patient and procedural factors that alone or in combination can cause or contribute to embolization of the device, including improper positioning before deployment, poor image intensifier angle, poor coaxial alignment of the valve and delivery system, severe septal hypertrophy, minimally or bulky/severely calcified leaflets, loss of pacing capture, a narrow sinotubular junction (in aortic position procedures), rapid deployment, the release of stored tension during deployment, inaccurate measurement of the landing zone, and movement of the delivery system by the operator.The ifu cautions that incorrect sizing of the landing zone may lead to paravalvular leak, migration, or embolization.The device training manuals instruct the operator on proper positioning and deployment of the valve, including all procedural and anatomical considerations.Physicians are extensively trained by edwards before they are qualified to use the sapien transcatheter heart valves (all models).Training includes patient screening, device preparation, approach, deployment, imaging, procedure-specific training manuals, and proctored procedures.The correct alignment and positioning of the device at the point of deployment is emphasized as a key factor in the placement and fixation of the device.Operators are also instructed to use fluoroscopy as the primary method of visualization for positioning and deployment.In patients with high-risk anatomical features for embolization (i.E., minimal leaflet calcification, severe septal hypertrophy), balloon valvuloplasty may indicate potential balloon movement during valve deployment.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a product malfunction contributed to this adverse event.Investigation results suggest that turning off the pacing prior to the complete deflation of the delivery system balloon caused or contributed to this event.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of this adverse event is not required at this time.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.As such, neither a product risk assessment, nor corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA VALVE
Common Device Name
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key23043302
Report Number2015691-2025-07549
Device Sequence Number18655581
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103215793
UDI-Public(01)00690103215793(17)280409(11)250410
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P140031
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 09/12/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number9755RSL20A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/22/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/12/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/10/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-