| Catalog Number |
UL2-C |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Ejection Problem (4009)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/17/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Qn# (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported "when placing the first implant on the left bladder neck, the user pulled the trigger of the handle 4 times, but the implant couldn't be placed.The device was removed from the body and checked.The device had not worked since the needle was halfway out (after pull 2).The handle did not move, and the cartridge could not be removed".The patient's current condition is reported as "fine".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).A visual inspection of the returned cartridge was conducted, and the following observations were made: the cartridge was shipped loose (not in a tray).The cartridge knob was locked.The pusher was not deployed.The cutter was not deployed.The suture/suture support tube was not buckled.The urethral endpiece (ue) was ready to deploy.The distal tip was undamaged.The capsular tab (ct) was deployed.The needle tip was undamaged.A scope seal was not returned with the cartridge.The items listed above are indicators of device status and are indicative of proper device function.The following discrepancies were noted during visual inspection: needle damaged: needle is broken.The needle tab overmold was bowed.The needle was found to be broken approximately 18mm from the tip.Comparison with reference needle shows no reduction in the overall length of the broken needle.The break interface of the broken needle is irregular, and it is not possible to determine if there is any missing material to report.Any possible missing material is esti-mated to be less than 1 mm in length.Measuring the remaining suture in the device revealed approximately 183mm of suture remained.This indicates that the ct and 20mm of suture were delivered.This is derived from the following formula: implant delivered = 203 mm - 183mmtypical implanted length is 5 - 30 mm the suture cut quality is typical in appearance.Functional inspection was not performed because bone strike is a documented known possible outcome of the urolift procedure which is typically the result of device positioning or excessive movement of the device or patient anatomy.Device history record investigation did not show issues related to complaint.The customer report of: " implant couldn't be placed" was confirmed.Confirmation is based on the investigation results showing that the device encountered a bone strike.This is a known possible outcome of the procedure and is not indicative of a device malfunction.This investigation has determined that the device encountered the following failure mode: ul-needle damage: needle damage occurs when the needle strikes bone.The probable root cause of this failure mode is use error- un-intentional- cannot determine.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend for complaints of this nature.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported "when placing the first implant on the left bladder neck, the user pulled the trigger of the handle 4 times, but the implant couldn't be placed.The device was removed from the body and checked.The device had not worked since the needle was halfway out (after pull 2).The handle did not move, and the cartridge could not be removed".The patient's current condition is reported as "fine".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|