• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIODYNAMICS, INC SMART PORT CT; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIODYNAMICS, INC SMART PORT CT; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number H787CT80STPA0
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Dehydration (1807); Diarrhea (1811); Dyspnea (1816); Unspecified Infection (1930); Muscle Weakness/Atrophy (1967); Vomiting (2144); Decreased Appetite (4569)
Date of Event 11/02/2019
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
On or about (b)(6) 2019, plaintiff underwent left subclavian placement of an angiodynamics smartport port catheter device, with model number h787ct80stpa0, and lot number 5460181.This smartport device was comprised of a port body and a polyurethane catheter.This smartport device was implanted by dr.(b)(6), m.D., at (b)(6) in (b)(6), and the purpose of implantation of the smartport was to administer medication to treat plaintiff's (b)(6) disease.On or about (b)(6) 2019, plaintiff presented to (b)(6) in (b)(6), with complaints of weakness, shortness of breath, dehydration, nausea, vomiting, and poor oral intake.Plaintiff subsequently underwent lab work and blood cultures, which revealed her smartport device was infected, and would need to be removed.On or about (b)(6) 2019, while still hospitalized at (b)(6) in (b)(6), plaintiff underwent removal of the infected smartport device, and the procedure was performed by dr.(b)(6) m.D.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The customer's reported complaint description of patient infection cannot be confirmed given the patient centric nature of this serious adverse event (sae).No port device was returned for evaluation since there was no report of port device malfunction, damage or performance issue during in situ use/treatment.A device history record (dhr) review of the indicated packaging lot revealed no quality related issues or manufacturing deficiencies at the time of manufacture.Sterilization load release records were reviewed for the packaging lot in question; no issues were observed.The port was implanted into the patient 56 days prior to the patient's infection.There was no report of port device malfunction or performance issue during use.If the manufacturing/packaging/sterilization of the port device in question was to contribute to an infection in the patient it would have likely occurred shortly after the implant date and not 56 days later.Device directions for use (dfu) cautions that each access of the port should be performed using aseptic technique, following the institutions universal precautions.There is no indication from the reported complaint that the manufacturing/packaging/sterilization of the port device could have contributed to the patient's infection.Infection is cautioned in the device dfu as a potential complication of port system use.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) that is provided with the port device contains the following statements: warnings: · the device is to be implanted, used, maintained, and removed in strict accordance with institutional and or centers for disease control (cdc) guidelines or policies.· reuse of single-use devices creates a potential risk of patient or user infections.Contamination of the device may lead to injury, illness or death of the patient.· do not use syringes smaller than 10 ml syringe when accessing the port as system damage can occur.Flushing occluded catheters with small syringes can create excessive pressures within the port system.Precautions · carefully read and follow all instructions prior to use.· strict aseptic technique is of paramount importance when implanting any device.· for peripheral placement, irritation to the vein, resulting in postoperative thrombophlebitis, has been associated with guidewire and introducer insertion.· when using percutaneous introducers: to avoid blood vessel damage, do not allow the percutaneous introducer sheath to remain indwelling in the blood vessel without the internal support of a catheter or dilator.· if more than one drug is to be administered, between the individual drug applications, flush the system with 5 to 10 ml normal saline for injection to prevent drug interactions.· after any infusion, injection or bolus application, the system should be flushed with normal saline for injection or locked with a heparin solution per institutional protocol to prevent thrombotic occlusion of the catheter.Potential complications use of an angiodynamics port system involves potential risks normally associated with the insertion or use of any implanted device or indwelling catheter including but not limited to: air embolism catheter disconnection or migration catheter embolization catheter fragmentation catheter pinch-off clot formation drug extravasation (leakage) erosion of vessel and skin implant rejection infection inflammation thromboembolism thrombophlebitis thrombosis necrosis of scarring of skin over implant area vessel trauma post-operative care the incision site should be monitored for signs of infection, inflammation, hematoma, device rotation or erosion.Routine wound care should be given to these sites.The smart port ct implantable port may be used immediately after verification of catheter placement.Instruct patient to avoid any heavy exertion or strenuous activity during the first few days after surgery.General guidelines · each access of an angiodynamics smart port ct implantable port should be performed using aseptic technique.· follow institutional universal precautions.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no adverse trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint continues to be monitored for trends.Reference (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SMART PORT CT
Common Device Name
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIODYNAMICS, INC
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls NY 12801
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIODYNAMICS, INC
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls NY 12801
Manufacturer Contact
alexandra invencio
26 forest street
marlborough, MA 01752
5086587990
MDR Report Key23052079
Report Number1317056-2025-00239
Device Sequence Number15908847
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier15051684018029
UDI-Public15051684018029
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNM
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K062414
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Device Explanted Year2019
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 09/15/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/31/2020
Device Model NumberH787CT80STPA0
Device Catalogue NumberCT80STPA
Device Lot Number5460181
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/20/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/15/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured05/02/2019
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Other; Hospitalization; Life Threatening;
Patient SexFemale
-
-