|
DEPUY MITEK LLC US VAPR 3.5MM HOOK 1-PIECE ELECTRODE -EA; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
227305 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/04/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an anterior cruciate ligament repair surgery, it was observed that the vapr 3.5mm hook 1-piece electrode device could not cut and could not coagulate.Another device was used to complete the surgery.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.No additional information could be provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: as of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H.11.Additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11.Additional narrative: the products were returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.Visual inspection of the returned device found it was not returned in its original package.The tip, handle, shaft and plug did not show any signs of damage.A functional test was performed by activation of the device, the device was connected to a test generator, also a test footswitch was used, the default values were displayed correctly (vapr vue, ablate power 120 and coagulate power 90), no alert messages were displayed.The ablation function was activated using the foot pedal several times in its maximum power for one minute each test, and it sounded as if it was working however no visual activation signs were observed.The coagulation function was activated using the foot pedal several times in its maximum power for one minute each test, and it worked as intended.The device will be send to the manufacturer for further testing.A visual inspection of the device was performed by the manufacturer; as a result, device was not received in its original packaging, the tip had light usage seen through the discoloration and rounding of the tip of the hook, and discoloration of the return electrode, there were light scratch marks across the ceramic.The device passed all functional and electrical testing.During the investigation, it was found that the device performed as expected, with no observations being noted.The complaint cannot be substantiated.The overall complaint was no confirmed as the observed condition of vapr 3.5mm hook 1-piece electrode-ea would have not contributed to the complained issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause for the observed condition is traced to the procedural variables, such handling of the device or normal product interaction during procedure.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: correction: h4: the device manufacture date was reported as 2/9/2023 in the initial report.Please note that the date of manufacture has been updated to 3/2/2023.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|