| Catalog Number |
NOD8J |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Nonstandard Device (1420); Defective Component (2292)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/27/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient was getting prepared for an ultrasound guided ascites percutaneous drainage catheter placement procedure using navarre opti-drain drainage.Prior to the procedure, it was reported that the length of trocar needle was allegedly found longer than catheter too much.There was no patient contact.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient was getting prepared for an ultrasound guided ascites percutaneous drainage catheter placement procedure using navarre opti-drain drainage.Prior to the procedure, it was reported that the length of trocar needle was allegedly found longer than catheter too much.There was no patient contact.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation; one electronic photo was provided for review.The photo shows a partial view of the drainage catheter in which the trocar needle was protruded from the catheter.However, it is not sufficient to determine if the product meets the specification.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported trocar needle length issue.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labelling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.G3, h6 (device, method, result, conclusion).Section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|