• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN 840 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN 840 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Model Number 4-840120DIJJ-JP
Medical Device Problem Code No Flow (2991)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/27/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during use on a patient, the 840 ventilator generated an alarm indicating that the ventilation stopped with di agnostic code.The patient was removed from the ventilator and placed on an alternate ventilator without injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a patient information and section e initial reporter cannot be provided due to japanese privacy regulations.Section e.Japan medtronic personnel reported event to manufacturer on behalf of the customer.A review of the logs confirmed that the ventilator stopped ventilation.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Correction d4 unique identifier (udi)# section h6 evaluation codes were updated due to device evaluation.Method code (annex b) remove b21 and add b01 result code (annex c) remove c21 and add c13 conclusion code (annex d) remove d16 and add d02 component code (annex g) remove g07003 and add g02005 h3 device evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based on all information received.It was reported that during use on a patient, the 840 ventilator generated an alarm indicating that the ventilation stopped with multiple diagnostic codes.The device was available for evaluation.A review of the logs confirmed that the ventilator stopped ventilation.The service personnel (sp) inspected the ventilator, found multiple background diagnostic codes in the logs and based on the code sp replaced the analog interface (ai) printed circuit board (pcb).The ventilator passed all calibrations and tests per manufacturer specifications at the time of service.The cause of the event was isolated to potential fault in ai pcb.The event is included in a data monitoring plan.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9 was updated due to part return section h6 evaluation codes were updated due to analysis of part returned conclusion code (annex d) remove d02 and add d15 component code (annex g) remove g02005 and add g07001 h3 device evaluation summary: was updated due to analysis of part returned medtronic conducted an investigation based on all information received.It was reported that during use on a patient, the 840 ventilator generated an alarm indicating that the ventilation stopped with multiple diagnostic codes.The device was available for evaluation.A review of the logs confirmed that the ventilator stopped ventilation.The service personnel (sp) inspected the ventilator, found multiple background diagnostic codes in the logs and based on the codes sp replaced the analog interface (ai) printed circuit board (pcb).The ventilator passed all calibrations and tests per manufacturer specifications at the time of service.The ai pcb was returned to medtronic for analysis.The component was visually inspected and functionally tested with no malfunction or product deficiency observed.Since the ai pcb returned and tested satisfactorily a cause of the event could not be established.A potential cause of the reported event was a transient communication issue with the ai pcb or associated connections which was resolved when the pcb was removed.The event is included in a data monitoring plan.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
840 VENTILATOR
Common Device Name
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
micheal collins rd mervue
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
micheal collins rd mervue
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
mike bocchino
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112-4391
8006464633
MDR Report Key23065011
Report Number8020893-2025-00218
Device Sequence Number9850274
Product Code CBK
UDI-Device Identifier10884521076891
UDI-Public(01)10884521076891(11)170323
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K151252
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/15/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number4-840120DIJJ-JP
Device Catalogue Number4-840120DIJJ-JP
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/28/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/27/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/16/2025
10/10/2025
01/13/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/16/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/16/2025
10/20/2025
01/15/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/23/2017
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-