| Catalog Number |
RBYXL4070 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Premature Separation (4045)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/18/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat a type ii endoleak of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa) graft using a ruby xl, a non-penumbra catheter, and a radio frequency guidewire (rf guidewire).During the procedure, the rf guidewire was used multiple times prior to the advancement of the ruby xl.While advancing the ruby xl through the catheter, the physician experienced resistance, and the ruby xl became stuck.Upon attempting to retract the ruby xl, the embolization coil unintentionally detached within the catheter.The catheter containing the detached ruby xl was removed.It was reported that the catheter was damaged with the usage of the rf guidewire.The procedure was completed using another ruby xl, two packing coil xls, and a new non-penumbra catheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device has been returned, and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Evaluation of the returned ruby xl confirmed that the embolization coil was detached.Evaluation revealed that the pet lock was intact, and the pet bump was advanced distal to the distal detachment tip (ddt).If the ruby xl is manipulated against resistance, the pusher assembly may elongate beyond the reach of the distal tip of the pull wire, causing the embolization coil to detach.The kinks on the non-penumbra catheter may have caused resistance during the procedure.Further evaluation revealed a kink and offset coil winds.This damage is incidental to the reported complaint, and the root cause could not be determined.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|