• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. LOGIC TIBIA PS MOD INSRT SZ 3.5 11MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. LOGIC TIBIA PS MOD INSRT SZ 3.5 11MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 02-012-35-3511
Medical Device Problem Code Naturally Worn (2988)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Pain (1994)
Date of Event 09/03/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
As reported, approximately 9 years and 6 months post the initial left total knee arthroplasty, the patient complained of pain and was revised due to poly wear of the insert.There was no reported breakage of a device or surgical delay/prolongation.The patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device will not be returned for analysis; however, an investigation of the reported event is in progress.Once the investigation is completed, a supplemental medwatch 3500a will be submitted.D10: (b)(6) 02-010-01-0235 - logic femoral ps cem left sz 3.5.(b)(6) 02-012-45-3535 - lgc tibial fit tray cem sz 3.5f / 3.5t.(b)(6) 200-02-35 - three peg patella 35mm.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: h4, h6.No device was returned for evaluation; pre-revision radiographs and images of the explanted tibial insert were provided.The review noted wear and pitting of the articular surface of the explanted tibial insert, in addition to wear of the anterior and posterior aspect of the spine.The posterior wear of the tibial insert spine likely occurred from contacting the femoral component cam during deep flexion, while the anterior wear of the tibial insert spine was likely caused from contacting the femoral cam in extension.This wear to the spine may have occurred due to bone cement overhanging from the femoral implant.However, this cannot be confirmed as images of the femoral component were not provided.The provided pre-revision radiographs appear unremarkable with respect to wear or implant malaligment.Operative notes and/or medical records were not provided for review of usage/ technique.A review of complaint history determined that no further action is required as no trends were identified.The revision reported was likely the result of prosthesis wear and inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall.Possible causes for polyethylene damage include high contact stresses during knee flexion and extension, inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall, or any combination of these possibilities.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LOGIC TIBIA PS MOD INSRT SZ 3.5 11MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66th ct
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer Contact
geoff gannon
2320 nw 66th ct
gainesville, FL 32653
3523771140
MDR Report Key23082962
Report Number1038671-2025-02938
Device Sequence Number17330593
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier10885862001856
UDI-Public10885862001856
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K093360
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/22/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/01/2021
Device Catalogue Number02-012-35-3511
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/04/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/18/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/18/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/22/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/08/2013
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
SEE H11.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization;
Patient Age85 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-