|
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER CONSTELLATION VISION SYSTEM, ACCESSORY, OZIL TORSIONAL HANDPIECE; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
8065750469 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Eye Burn (2523)
|
| Date of Event |
09/09/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).H.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A healthcare professional reported that during cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation, shortly after starting phacoemulsification, the patient experienced a corneal burn in the left eye.The ophthalmic handpiece appeared milky.Shortly thereafter, surgery continued without the phacoemulsification handpiece, using a vitrectomy cutter with corticosteroid instead.After insertion of a pupil expansion ring, vitrectomy was continued.The cornea was sutured.Acetylcholine, balanced salt solution, and antibiotic were applied to the cornea.Human amnion was placed on the cornea, followed by a contact lens.Miotics and antibiotic eye drops were administered.A carbonic anhydrase inhibitor was given by anesthesiology.Eye dressing was applied, and no lens was implanted.Procedure details and the patient¿s current condition have not been provided.Additional information has been requested; none has been received to date.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information is provided in sections h.6 and h.11.The product under investigation is not a serviceable device.Therefore, a service record review was not performed.There was no product returned for this investigation.There was no additional, related information provided.Based on the information obtained, the root cause of the reported event is inconclusive.A non-conformance based review of the serial number was performed and did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.A manufacturing device history record (dhr) review was performed prior to product release to ensure that the product was manufactured in compliance with the device master record.Based on the assessment, the product met release criteria.A review for complaints reported against this serial number was performed.No similar complaints were reported for the serial under investigation.Based on the information obtained, the root cause of the reported event is inconclusive.Manufacturer will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.Similar incident/event data was collected for the associated reported events.Quality assurance will continue to perform periodic monitoring for evidence of adverse trending and take further action as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).H.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information is provided in sections d.9, h.3, h.6 and h.11.The product under investigation is not a serviceable device.Therefore, a service record review was not performed.A phaco handpiece (hp) was returned for testing on this investigation.A non-conformance-based review of the serial number was performed and did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.A manufacturing device history record (dhr) review was performed prior to product release to ensure that the product was manufactured in compliance with the device master record.Based on the assessment, the product met release criteria.A review for complaints reported against this serial number was performed.No similar complaints were reported for the product serial under investigation.The hp was received for testing.A visual assessment of the returned sample revealed no obvious non-conformities.The returned sample was connected to a calibrated system.The handpiece tuned successfully and completed a five-minute burn-in test with the system set at 100% ultrasonic and torsional power.The handpiece was connected to dynamic tuning fixture (dtf) for stroke length testing on the longitudinal and torsional movements which found the handpiece to meet specifications.By proactively implementing preventive strategies to optimize surgical outcomes, surgeons will prioritize patient safety during msics procedures.However, the returned handpiece was found to meet specifications.Therefore, the root cause of the reported event is inconclusive.Manufacturer will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.Similar incident/event data was collected for the associated reported events.Quality assurance will continue to perform periodic monitoring for evidence of adverse trending and take further action as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4) h.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|