|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Note, the date of event is considered to be a best estimate as (11-sep-2025) based on the date of awareness.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.This mdr represents the perfix plug (device 3).Additional mdr's were submitted to represent the 3dmax (device 1), bard soft mesh (device 2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol 3dmax, bard soft mesh and perfix plug on (b)(6) 2014 and/or (b)(6) 2021 and/or (b)(6) 2024.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against all three devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.This file represents device 3.
|