| Catalog Number |
7211010 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Excess Flow or Over-Infusion (1311)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
| Date of Event |
09/06/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).H11 h3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a shoulder arthroscopy, a disposable set was placed on the dyonics 25 control unit with settings at 50° pressure and 1.0° flow.Seven minutes into the surgery, the shoulder became extremely swollen.The flow was managed to reduce to 20° then 0.7°.The procedure was completed without delay using the same device.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.During the visual inspection and functional evaluation, no damage was found that would interfere with the operation of the equipment.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The root cause could not be determined since the reported malfunction could not be duplicated during the product evaluation process.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|