• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. OSTEORAPTOR 2.3 W. UB COBRAID BLUE; STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. OSTEORAPTOR 2.3 W. UB COBRAID BLUE; STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 72201993
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/20/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a shoulder joint labrum repair surgery, it was noticed that the osteoraptor anchor broke while being implanted.All the pieces were removed with grasping forceps and suction.The procedure was resumed, after a non-significant delay using an equivalent s+n back-up.The back up was used in the originally drilled bone.There was no void left in the patient and the instrument to prepare the insertion site was a 2.3mm anchor matching instrument.The insertion site was cleared of all debris prior to insertion no further complications were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a shoulder joint labrum repair surgery, it was noticed that the osteoraptor anchor broke while being implanted.All the pieces were removed with grasping forceps and suction.The procedure was resumed, after a non-significant delay using an equivalent s+n back-up.The back up was used in the originally drilled bone.There was no void left in the patient and the instrument to prepare the insertion site was a 2.3mm anchor matching instrument.The insertion site was cleared of all debris prior to insertion no further complications were reported.Patient status is fine.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).H11 h3, h6: part of the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual evaluation showed the device was returned in original packaging with the batch number of the complaint on the label.The anchor was not returned.One blue/white suture was returned.The insertion device has no visible defect.A material assessment could not be performed due to the part not being returned for evaluation.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the material specifications found that the storage requirements for the material are specified, and the material must comply with provided percentage composition specifications as measured by ash test.The root cause could not be determined since the reported malfunction could not be duplicated during the investigation.Factors that can contribute to the reported event include an inadvertent impact event that may have occurred during device transportation, rough shipping and handling, or at the customer site, as well as the application of an unintended, inappropriate, or excessive force to the device.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OSTEORAPTOR 2.3 W. UB COBRAID BLUE
Common Device Name
STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
1450 brooks rd.
memphis, TN 38116
5123913905
MDR Report Key23181064
Report Number1219602-2025-02404
Device Sequence Number18419259
Product Code JDR
UDI-Device Identifier03596010615541
UDI-Public3596010615541
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K151105
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/28/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number72201993
Device Lot Number2144734
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/05/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/25/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/30/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/28/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/18/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-