• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTALINK PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTALINK PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 3241
Medical Device Problem Code Mechanical Jam (2983)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/24/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr.: the device was returned for analysis.A visual examination of the device found that a portion of a rotawire was stuck within the distal end of the burr and could not be removed.In order to test the functionality of the device, a test rotawire was used for analysis.During testing, the rotawire was able to be inserted through the advancer from the handshake connection.The rotawire could be inserted through the proximal end of the burr catheter up to the stuck rotawire portion with no resistance or issues.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the burr could not be loaded on the guide wire.A 1.75mm rotablator rotalink plus and rotawire were selected for rotational atherectomy.During the procedure, it was noted that the burr could not be loaded on the guide wire.The procedure was completed with a different device.No patient complications were reported.However, device analysis revealed that a portion of a rotawire was stuck within the distal end of the burr and could not be removed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr.: the device was returned for analysis.A visual examination of the device found that a portion of a rotawire was stuck within the distal end of the burr and could not be removed.In order to test the functionality of the device, a test rotawire was used for analysis.During testing, the rotawire was able to be inserted through the advancer from the handshake connection.The rotawire could be inserted through the proximal end of the burr catheter up to the stuck rotawire portion with no resistance or issues.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the burr could not be loaded on the guide wire.A 1.75mm rotablator rotalink plus and rotawire were selected for rotational atherectomy.During the procedure, it was noted that the burr could not be loaded on the guide wire.The procedure was completed with a different device.No patient complications were reported.However, device analysis revealed that a portion of a rotawire was stuck within the distal end of the burr and could not be removed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK PLUS
Common Device Name
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORK LIMITED
model farm road
cork T12 Y K88
EI   T12 YK88
Manufacturer Contact
mark mischke
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
7634941632
MDR Report Key23234499
Report Number2124215-2025-69771
Device Sequence Number15896296
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729228370
UDI-Public08714729228370
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryIN
PMA/510(K) Number
P900056
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/16/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/07/2026
Device Model Number3241
Device Catalogue Number3241
Device Lot Number0034183665
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/12/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/15/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/21/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/07/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/16/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/06/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age53 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-