| Catalog Number |
13546-02 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Failure to Power Up (1476)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
09/10/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an adenotonsillectomy, it was noticed that the coblator ii controller would not switch on.The hospital technician believed that the fuse may have been burnt.The patient was not exposed to additional anesthesia.The surgery was cancelled.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H11 h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection revealed a damaged overlay, and a cracked bezel.The foot pedal socket is loose.The reported malfunction was not duplicated during functional testing.The failure is associated with a well-known failure mode that has been thoroughly investigated in prior complaints.No new information, trends, or patient impact were identified that would warrant further review.Based on the information available, there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The root cause was not determined since the reported malfunction could not be duplicated during the product evaluation process.Factors that can contribute to the reported event include a failure of a concomitant device.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|