| Catalog Number |
72202467 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Failure to Fire (2610); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582); Cartilage damage (4833)
|
| Date of Event |
09/18/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6 this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during a meniscus repair, it was noticed that the fast-fix 360 t2 could not be deployed.Once the grey button was pushed forward for t2, there was no ¿click¿ to deploy the second anchor, and the anchor was stuck in the device shaft.The procedure was resumed, with a delay of less than 30 minutes, and with a change in surgical technique.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: h2: additional & corrected information on: b5 & h6 (impact code).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during a meniscus repair, it was noticed that the fast-fix 360 t2 implant could not be deployed.Once the grey button was pushed forward for t2, there was no ¿click¿ to deploy the second anchor, and the anchor was stuck in the device shaft.The t1 was removed from the patient with a grasper, and pulled on the suture and the implant tore out.The procedure was resumed, with a surgical delay of less than 30 minutes.It is unknown how the procedure was completed.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during a meniscus repair, it was noticed that the fast-fix 360 t2 could not be deployed.Once the grey button was pushed forward for t2, there was no ¿click¿ to deploy the second anchor, and the anchor was stuck in the device shaft.The t1 was removed with a grasper and pulled on the suture and the implant tore out.The procedure was resumed, with a surgical delay of less than 30 minutes.The procedure was completed with a change in surgical technique to meniscectomy.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: additional information on: b1, b2, b5, & h6 (clinical code & impact code).Corrected information on: h1 (type of reportable event) & h11 (results of investigation).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication related to a product problem with a smith+nephew device.The reported issue(s) relate to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual evaluation showed the device was returned with original labeling with the batch number of the complaint on it.The t1, t2, and suture were not returned.Bio debris is present.A functional evaluation showed that the actuator will not move.The gray slider moves freely indicating the push assembly has become inactive.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.During the investigation it was not possible to identify a definitive root cause; however, it was concluded that the potential causes for the reported event include (1) the application of unintended, inappropriate, or excessive force during device use, and (2) user failure to fully actuate the device during the implantation process.The risk management review confirmed that the reported failure is appropriately documented.The overall risk level is considered adequate.Therefore, no additional actions are deemed necessary at this time.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|