| Catalog Number |
CF7-7-100 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Overheating of Device (1437)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/17/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during use of the cf7-7-100 closurefast 7f 100cm catheter, the coil burned and high temperature was observed.This issue was noted for 4 catheters.A replacement catheter was used to complete the procedure.No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: the four catheters were used in 4 different patients.Compression was utilized.The coil issue was discovered post use in the patient and there was coagulant build-up on the heating element.There was no damage noted to coil and the coil was not exposed.It is unknown if any error messages/codes/warnings were displayed on the rfg.The catheters were safely removed from the patient and no vessel damage was noted.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product analysis no damage was noted to the catheter heating element/coil the catheter cable connector was examined: the catheter reference key shows evidence of wear, and the red ink was visible in some areas.All pins were visually inspected to be straight.No anomalies were noted along the catheter shaft.The catheter connector was plugged into the resistance tester to perform continuity/resistance and connected to rfg for functional testing; the catheter was tested according to the test parameters, test methods, and acceptance criteria.Test 1.(e+/ e- test) (specification: 80 ohms to 113 ohms) ¿ result = 0l ohms - fail test 2.(tc+/ tc- test) (specification: = 250 ohms) ¿ result = 158.5 ohms test 3.(resistor 1) (specification: 13.43 to 13.97 k ohms) result = 13.68 k ohms) test 4.(resistor 2) (specification: 7.90 k ohms to 8.22 k ohms) result = 8.06 k ohms) test 1 (e+/ e- test) failed.Tests 2, test 3, and test 4 passed and are inside the specification and acceptance criterion.The catheter was connected to both the rfg3 and rfg2 lab generator, the device did not complete the required cycle with an error message ¿advisory: impedance high.Check connection.¿ being seen on both the rfg2 and rfg3 generators addition photo for pins check taken after testing and connection to generators shows pins to be straight medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: all issues occurred on the same date.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|