|
|
| Model Number |
8888145042P |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Puncture/Hole (1504)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/26/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, in the patient's first dialysis treatment, the nurse noticed a small hole in the venous lumen.The lumen was flushed.It was stated that because the hole allowed blood to exit, the catheter was removed and replaced with a new hd (hemodialysis) catheter.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, in the patient's first dialysis treatment, the nurse noticed a small hole in the venous extension tube lumen near the bifurcate hub.Besides the reported issue, there were no other visible defects/damages found on the product at the time of the event.There were no other products utilized with the device.The lumen was flushed prior to starting the dialysis treatment, and the result was the patient did not receive dialysis until the catheter was replaced.It was stated that because the hole allowed blood to exit, the catheter was removed and replaced with a new hd (hemodialysis) catheter.Besides removing and replacing the catheter, there was no other remedial action done at the time of the event.After the remedial action was done, the treatment was continued and completed.There was no blood loss.Blood transfusion was not required due to the event.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: a1, a2, a3, a4, a5b b3, b5, d6a, d6b, e2, e3, g3 correction: e1 medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: d9, g3, h3, h6 h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the catheter had visible signs of use.The returned device was clamped and flushed with water, revealing a pin-hole leak in the venous extension tube.It was reported that there was a hole on the extension tube near the bifurcate/hub.The reported issue was confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.This issue can occur when the catheter came into contact with a sharp instrument during use.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional info: a1, b5, d6b, g3 medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, in the patient's first dialysis treatment, the nurse noticed a small hole in the venous extension tube lumen near the bifurcate hub.Besides the reported issue, there were no other visible defects/damages found on the product at the time of the event.There were no other products utilized with the device.The lumen was flushed prior to starting the dialysis treatment, and the result was the patient did not receive dialysis until the catheter was replaced, because the flushing revealed a leak at the venous extension tube lumen near the bifurcate hub.It was stated that because the hole allowed blood to exit, the catheter was removed and replaced with a new hd (hemodialysis) catheter.It was mentioned that the first time the reported product was inserted was on 9/26/25 and the replacement was done on 10/1/25.Besides the medical intervention of removing and replacing the catheter, there was no other remedial action done at the time of the event.After the remedial action was done, the treatment was continued and completed.There was no blood loss.Blood transfusion was not required due to the event.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|