|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 TITANIUM IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, KIT, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
0605320 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/19/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: date of death for this patient was not provided, date of death updated as (b)(6) 1900 for the mdr submission requirement.As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the catheter allegedly had migration.Later, the patient passed away.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: subsequent review determined the initial classification relied on litigation language (including loss of consortium) without evidence of patient death or device causation.No death certificate, autopsy, clinician statement, or hospital documentation was provided.Current information supports serious injury criteria.Hence, the event type has been corrected from ¿death¿ to serious injury.Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No medical records were provided for review.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported catheter migration as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B2, b5, g3, h1(type of reportable events), h6 (patient) section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that, sometime after the port placement, the catheter had allegedly migrated.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|