|
Investigation summary: the complaint investigation for false positive results when doing negative qc testing with the bd max¿ gbs assay (ref.441772) lot 5029035 was performed by the review of manufacturing records, review of customer¿s data and by the complaint¿s history review.The review of quality control records of bd max¿ gbs assay lot 5029035 revealed no anomalies that could explain the customer¿s false positive results.Customer provided the database for instrument ct0264 along with run files (pdf and csv) for runs 1576 and 1577 for investigation.Based on the database and run file review, four samples using lot 5029035 were identified with positive results: positions a10 (run 1442), a10 (run 1452), b9 (run 1470), and a10 (run 1483).Manual pcr curve adjudication was performed on all four samples, revealing late and low, but true, amplification of the gbs target in the fam channel.These samples were repeated on the same day with the same kit lot, different sbt, and all had an expected negative result.Data analysis suggests that positive results in negative controls are not a new issue for this customer.Such results have been observed since at least 2024 and across multiple kit lots, confirming that the customer¿s issue is not lot specific.A negative result upon repeat was obtained for all 24 unexpected positive results for negative controls recorded since 2024 on initial test.This suggests that the issue likely occurs during the preparation of the two controls, positive and negative, as they are always together in the same run.In contrast, the repeat tests always contain solely the defective negative control.Moreover, a bd associate visiting on site made two runs on (b)(6) 2025, one with known negative patient samples and one from negative control samples made using 15ul of lim broth in sbt, with a different kit lot, in runs 1576 and 1577, and the results were negative.Presence of only expected results in these two runs suggests the issue may be isolated to specific events.Nevertheless, manual curve adjudication has limitations; visual examination of pcr curves is a conservative assessment of the data.Based on the data and information provided, cross contamination introduced during samples control preparation at the customer¿s site is the most likely cause to explain the unexpected positive results.There is no indication of a reagent issue based on the analysis of the complaints received for discrepant results on bd max¿ gbs lot 5029035.The root cause was not identified.Bd cannot confirm the complaint based on the investigation that was performed.Bd did not initiate a corrective and preventive action since no new hazard was identified.Bd apologizes for the inconvenience that this may have caused.Bd quality will continue to monitor for trends.
|