| Model Number |
D143 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem (1573); Inaccurate Synchronization (1609)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Ventricular Fibrillation (2130)
|
| Date of Event |
09/22/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) presented with a rhythm that the physician determined was a slow ventricular tachycardia (vt).A burst of commanded anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) was delivered, followed by burst of device driven atp, resulting in the rhythm accelerating into ventricular fibrillation (vf).Then, this device successfully delivered a shock and converted the rhythm.Technical services (ts) was contacted and analyzed the episode data and noted the device appeared to be operating as programmed.This icd remains in service.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) presented with a rhythm that the physician determined was a slow ventricular tachycardia (vt).A burst of commanded anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) was delivered, followed by burst of device driven atp, resulting in the rhythm accelerating into ventricular fibrillation (vf).Then, this device successfully delivered a shock and converted the rhythm.Technical services (ts) was contacted and analyzed the episode data and noted the device appeared to be operating as programmed.This icd remains in service.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device remains in service; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of rhythm acceleration was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of known inherent risk of device.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|