|
H11: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The device has not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, photo was added.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: two s/l repair catheters were returned for sample evaluation.Along with return sample two video was provided for review.Gross, visual, microscopic visual, tactile and functional evaluations were performed.In sample one upon infusion, leak and ballooning was noted on the center portion of the clamping sleeve while water was exiting the distal end of the catheter.A longitudinal split was made on the clamping sleeve where the ballooning was observed for further investigation.Upon split created, small amounts of water were observed exiting the split area.An infusion test was performed once again, and small leaks were observed exiting the split.A longitudinal split was further created until reaching the luer.The split clamping sleeve was inspected, and the inner lumen was found to have a complete circumferential break with jagged edges and a granular surface.In sample two upon infusion, ballooning was noted on the center portion of the clamping sleeve while water was exiting the distal end of the catheter.Further evaluation was performed on the catheter area where ballooning was noted.Hydrostatic pressure was applied.Upon infusion, ballooning was noted on the center portion of the clamping sleeve.Longitudinal split was made to the clamping sleeve where the ballooning was noted for further investigation.The split clamping sleeve was inspected, and the inner lumen was found to have a complete circumferential break with jagged edges and a granular surface on the proximal end.Also split was noted proximal to the distal end of the tissue cuff.Ballooning was noted in video review for two both the devices.Liquid bubble formation on the catheter was due to minute spilt in both the catheter.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported air and gas issue and identified, fracture, material separation, fluid leak, stretch and material protrusion issues for both the devices.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labelling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B5, g3, h6 (device, component, method, result, conclusion).Section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient underwent a chronic catheter placement procedure using broviac cv catheter, single-lumen, 4.2f.During the procedure, the outer layer of the larger caliber section near the clamp was allegedly found bubble formation.There were no reported patient injury.
|