• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU375
Medical Device Problem Code Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse (1254)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/16/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section a-2 patient age/date of birth: unknown/asked information was not provided.Section a-3a patient sex: unknown/asked information was not provided.Section a-3b patient gender: unknown/asked information was not provided.Section a-4 patient weight: unknown/asked information was not provided.Section a-5 patient ethnicity: unknown/asked information was not provided.Section a-6 patient race: unknown/asked information was not provided.Section d-6b date explanted: not applicable as the iol remains implanted; therefore, not explanted.Section h-3 device evaluated by manufacturer: the complaint device was not returned for evaluation as it remains implanted.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch report will be filed.Attempts were made to contact the customer account requesting additional information regarding complaint however, to date no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
The technician advanced the plunger of the diu375 model intraocular lens (iol) and it felt ok, but not sure.The lens was subsequently handed to the doctor, who proceeded to advance it into the patient¿s eye.It was noted that the trailing haptic was not positioned on the optic as anticipated but was instead straight within the cartridge barrel.The doctor utilized a grasper to remove the haptic from the injector and successfully placed the iol into the posterior capsule.The lens was undamaged, and there was no harm to the patient¿s eye.No patient injury was reported during the procedure.The suspect iol is not available for return as it remains implanted.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes section d-9: device date returned to manufacturer: 29-oct-2025 section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: the complaint simplicity was received inside a biohazard bag.During a visual inspection, the device was inspected under magnification.The handpiece was received with the plunger rod fully advanced.Viscoelastic residue was observed throughout the cartridge.Stress marks were observed on the cartridge tip but were in specification for a used device.No issues were identified with the lens module, device assembly, and plunger rod advancement.The plunger rod tip was bent.No lens was received for evaluation.No further evaluation was performed.The complaint issue "trailing haptic not folded" was not identified during product evaluation as no lens was received for evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.The manufacturing records for the product were reviewed; the units were released in accordance with specifications.A search revealed that no other complaints have been received for this production order (po) number.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: the following field was updated based on the additional information received: section b5: additional information indicated that the affected eye was the patient's right eye.There were no sutures and no vitrectomy required and it was confirmed that there was no harm to the patient.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key23318939
Report Number3012236936-2025-000271
Device Sequence Number4967872
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474748194
UDI-Public(01)05050474748194(17)260702
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/07/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/02/2026
Device Model NumberDIU375
Device Catalogue NumberDIU375U140
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/19/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/11/2025
04/17/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/16/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/11/2025
05/06/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/02/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-