• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH SYNCHRONY; COCHLEAR IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH SYNCHRONY; COCHLEAR IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number MI1250 SYNCHRONY 2
Medical Device Problem Code Impedance Problem (2950)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/28/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been explanted.If it should be explanted, it should be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow up report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user reports worsening hearing impression and speech understanding.The implant check revealed that the device is no longer functioning according to specification.Further actions have not yet been planned.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user reports worsening hearing impression and speech understanding.The implant check revealed that the device is no longer functioning according to specification.Further actions have not yet been planned.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: according to currently available information, damage to the active electrode likely caused by minute device mobility is likely.Further one channel migrated post-operatively out of cochlea.However, to determine an exact root cause a device investigation of the explanted device is necessary.No information on possible further steps has been received.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: damage to the active electrode which is consistent with minute device mobility was determined to have led to device failure over time due to fatigue wire breakages.Further one channel migrated post-operatively out of cochlea.The problems given in the recipient report appear to match the damage found.This is a final report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user reports worsening hearing impression and speech understanding.The implant check revealed that the device is no longer functioning according to specification.The user has been reimplanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNCHRONY
Common Device Name
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
57788
MDR Report Key23321750
Report Number9710014-2025-00971
Device Sequence Number9846028
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier09008737395353
UDI-Public(01)09008737395353
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
P000025
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Device Explanted Year2026
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/21/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date11/16/2023
Device Model NumberMI1250 SYNCHRONY 2
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/06/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/06/2025
10/06/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/17/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/30/2025
05/21/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/16/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age45 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-